Implementation of the Principle of Strict Liability Through Civil Law Enforcement to Protect and Manage the Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v2i3.244Keywords:
Strict Liability, Civil Law Enforcement, Protection and ManagementAbstract
The settlement of environmental disputes currently uses the principle of Liability based on Fault which requires the plaintiff to prove the element of fault of the defendant. The elimination of the principle of Strict Liability as regulated in Article 88 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management brings significant changes in the process of resolving environmental disputes. The purpose of this study is to determine the urgency of implementing the principle of Strict Liability and to analyze the legal implications of eliminating the principle of Strict Liability as an effort to resolve environmental disputes. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The purpose of the study is to explain the concept of strict liability and its legal basis, describe civil law in environmental cases, and assess the effectiveness of strict liability in protecting the environment. The principle of strict liability is an important tool in environmental law to enforce responsibility for environmental pollution and damage without having to prove fault. Civil law enforcement can be an effective instrument if supported by a strong judicial system and public awareness.
Downloads
References
Andi Hamzah, Environmental Law Enforcement, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005 Andri Gunawan Wibisana, (2019), “On the No Longer Poisonous Tail: A Conceptual Critique of Administrative Sanctions in Environmental Law in Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law,
I Gede Yusa dan Bagus Hermanto, 2018, “Implementation of the Green Constitution in Indonesia: Guarantee of Constitutional Rights for Sustainable Environmental Development,” Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 15, No. 2,
Jones, C. A., Pendergrass, J., Broderick, J., & Phelps, J. 2015. Tropical conservation and liability for environmental harm. Environmental Law Reporter, 45, 32-50.
Machmud, S. 2012. Indonesian environmental law enforcement: Enforcement based on administrative law, civil law and criminal law according to Law No. 32 of 2009. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Moleong, Lexy. 2014. Qualitative Research Methods Revised Edition. Jakarta: Remaja Rosda Karya.Muhammad Insa Ansari, 2021, “Implications of Environmental Regulations On Legislation in Business Activities (Constitutional Perspective),” Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 11, No. 2, hlm. 279.
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad. 2010. Dualism of Normative and Empirical Legal Research, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, Cetakan 1,),
Mustafa, M., & Ariffin, M. 2011. Protection of marine biodiversity from pollution: Legal strategies in Malaysia. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, 1(4), 276-281.
Ngadino, A., & Zulhidayat. 2015. Environmental lawsuits and compensation in Environmental law: Theory, legislation and case studies. Syarif, L. M., & Wibisana, A. G. (Eds.). Jakarta: Kemitraan Partnership.
Sadino, Surono, A., & Arifin, M. Z. 2020. Legal analysis on application of strict liability in oil palm plantation fire cases in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 504, 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/504/1/012026
Siswanto Sunarto, 2009, Environmental Criminal Law and Law Enforcement Strategies, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika).
Sodikin. 2007. Environmental law enforcement review of Law Number 23 of 1997. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Wibisana, A. G. 2021. Job Creation Law and strict liability. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 5(3), 494. 522.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











