The Analysis of Damages and Remedies In Environmental Law: Case Study of PT. Kallista Alam

Authors

  • Miftahur Rahmah Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Nurleli Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Sahrizal Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Riski Anggara Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Hatta Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v2i3.243

Keywords:

Environmental Law, Strict Liability, Compensation, Ecological Recovery, Sustainable Development

Abstract

One of the important events in environmental law enforcement in Indonesia is the case of PT. Kallista Alam about the
burning of peatland in Rawa Tripa, Aceh. Based on the decision of the Meulaboh District Court No. 12/PDT. G/2012/PN.
MBO, which was later strengthened by the Banda Aceh High Court and the Supreme Court, the purpose of this study is to
examine aspects of compensation and environmental restoration. The research uses juridical-normative methods, using the
analysis of court decisions. The results of the analysis show that, based on Article 88 of Law No. 32 of 2009, the court
applies the principle of strict responsibility, which establishes responsibility without proof of error. PT. Kallista Alam was
subject to compensation and recovery of IDR 366 billion, including ecological losses and active recovery. However, many
challenges hinder the implementation of the decision. This includes constant legal remedies and inadequate oversight of
executions. Concerning the principles of ecological justice and sustainable development, this decision relies heavily on
cooperation between judicial institutions, government, and civil society.
Keywords: Environmental Law, Strict Liability, Compensation, Ecological Recovery, Sustainable Development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Raharjo, Agus. Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2016.

Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2017). Dualisme penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Bandung: Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2011). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.

Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Rangkuti, S. S. (2016). Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijakan Perlindungan Sumber Daya Alam.

Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Soemartono, M. (2013). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia. Bandung:

Alumni.

Damanik, E. (2020, April 23). Pemulihan Rawa Tripa Masih Jalan di Tempat. Mongabay

Indonesia.

Hadi, S. (2010). Metodologi research. Yogyakarta: Andi

Erwiningsih, E. (2018). Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Berbasis Strict Liability terhadap

Korporasi Pembakar Hutan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(2), 233–250.

https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no2.1739

Boyd, J. (2010). Lost Ecosystem Goods and Services as a Measure of Marine Oil Pollution

Damages. Resources for the Future. https://www.rff.org

Perman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., & Common, M. (2011). Natural Resource and

Environmental Economics (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education

Turner, R. K., Pearce, D., & Bateman, I. (2003). Environmental Economics: An Elementary

Introduction (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Afandi, A. (2018). Eksekusi Pemulihan Lingkungan Pasca Putusan Perdata: Tantangan

Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 7(1), 23–34.

Bosselmann, K. (2010). The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance

(2nd ed.). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

Yayasan Ekosistem Lestari (YEL). (2015). Laporan Investigasi Dampak Lingkungan Rawa

Tripa. Medan: YEL

Yayasan Ekosistem Lestari (YEL). (2019). Monitoring Pemulihan Ekosistem Rawa Tripa

Tahun Keempat. Medan: YEL.

Klassen, R. D. (2020). Environmental Valuation Methods in Litigation: Lessons from

Southeast Asia. Environmental Law Review, 22(4), 217–229.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452920965201

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK). (2014). Laporan Kerusakan

Ekologis di Rawa Tripa, Aceh. Jakarta: KLHK.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK). (2017). Laporan Evaluasi Eksekusi

Putusan Lingkungan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Gakkum KLHK.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan

Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 651 K/Pdt/2015. (2015).

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Meulaboh Nomor 12/PDT.G/2012/PN.MBO. (2014).

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Banda Aceh Nomor 50/PDT/2014/PT BNA. (2014).

Walhi. “PT Kallista Alam Terbukti Bakar Lahan Gambut di Rawa Tripa.” Walhi, or id, 2014.

https://www.walhi.or.id

Greenpeace. (2013). Rawa Tripa: Hutan Gambut yang Terbakar dan Terancam Punah.

Greenpeace Indonesia.

Greenpeace. (2015). Enam Tahun Keadilan Rawa Tripa: Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum

Lingkungan. Jakarta: Greenpeace Indonesia.

Walhi. (2014). Putusan Pengadilan Meulaboh Menangkan Negara dan Lingkungan. WALHI

Aceh. https://www.walhi.or.id

Downloads

Published

2025-10-09

How to Cite

Miftahur Rahmah, Nurleli, Sahrizal, Riski Anggara, & Muhammad Hatta. (2025). The Analysis of Damages and Remedies In Environmental Law: Case Study of PT. Kallista Alam. International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities , 2(3), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v2i3.243

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.