Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Please prepare your manuscript before sending it, using the writing instructions below. Please download the CENDEKIA Template (.DOCX) file.

  • TITLE

The Title are Written with Book Antique Bold (16 pt) and Preferably Not More Than 14 Words, Align Left

  • AUTHOR& AFFILIATION

Written full name and without using a title.

Affiliation example: Faculty of Law Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia. (see SASI Template)

Muhammad[1], Hatta[2] & Ash-Singkily[3]*

[1] Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Acheh, Indonesia

[2] Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Acheh, Indonesia

[3] Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Acheh, Indonesia

 

  • ABSTRACT

Abstracts are written in English. Writing abstract title using bolds for abstract substance written Book Antiqua, 10 pt, italic, 1 space, max 250 words. (see SASI Template)

  • KEYWORDS

Keywords written in English. Key writing uses Book Antiqua, 10 pt in size, italics. Keywords are written in words or phrases, preferably in phrases. Keywords consist of 3-5 words or 3-5 phrases, and must be separated by (;) semicolons, not commas (,).  

  • INTRODUCTION

The introduction should be clear and provide the issue to be discussed in the manuscript. Before the objective, authors should provide an adequate background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing solutions, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what do you hope to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper.[1]

At the end of the paragraph, the author/s should end with a comment on the significance concerning identification of the issue and objective of the research.[2] This article analyses the comparative competition law related to abuse of a dominant market position using strategy of predatory pricing by undertakings in the European Union (hereinafter ‘EU’). For this purpose, a precise case study of the Valio case has been made.[3] Antti Aine, Adjunct Professor of general competition law at the University of Turku as expert in field of European Competition Law, has been interviewed for this article.[4] Also, EU law on predatory pricing has been compared to the United States’ predatory pricing law.

Therefore, this article explores the following research questions; whether EU Competition law policy is already excessively restrictive, and if so, what is the effect on the business development of undertakings with only one nationally dominant market position and, whether the products, which are legally classified as belonging to different product markets, belong de facto to the same product market in case of being fully interchangeable with each other?

  • METHOD

The method is optional for original research articles. This method is written in descriptive and should provide a statement regarding the methodology of the research. This method as much as possible to give an idea to the reader through the methods used. This Method are optional, only for original research articles.

  • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The writing of the Results and Discussion section contains the results or research findings (scientific finding) which is followed by a scientific discussion. The description of the discussion in the Results and Discussion chapter is descriptive, analytical and critical. The description of the discussion must be adjusted to the sequence of legal issues that are the main elements in the study. Theories included in the theoretical framework should be cited in this chapter. The state of art listed in the Introduction Section is also reviewed and elaborated in the Results and Discussion Section. The analysis in the Results and Discussion section can be supported by a table that is presented horizontally. Table presentation is equipped with “Table Title” and “Table Source.” Each Table is followed by the author's review and comments as part of the analysis of the Tables presented. In addition to the table, the provisions of the Act or other regulations presented are accompanied by studies and opinions of the authors in strengthening and sharpening the analysis of articles submitted for publication.

Tables and Figures are presented center and cited in the manuscript. The figures should be clearly readable and at least have a resolution of 300 DPI (Dots Per Inch) for good printing quality. Table made with the open model (without the vertical lines) as shown below:

Table 1. Global Piracy: Actual and Attempted Piracy Attack in Different Regions, 2007-2016.

Locations

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Southeast Asia

158

83

70

54

47

70

80

104

128

141

Far East

15

5

10

11

22

44

23

7

13

8

Indian Sub-continent

32

53

30

23

30

29

16

19

26

34

South America

45

29

21

14

37

40

25

17

18

5

Africa

71

61

120

189

266

259

293

150

79

55

Rest of World

8

8

12

3

8

4

2

0

0

2

Total

329

239

263

293

410

445

439

297

264

245

Source: Primary data, 2017 (Edited).

  • Main Heading of the First Analysis or Discussion

This section is the most important section of your article. The analysis or results of the research should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.

  • Sub-heading of the discussion
  • etc…
  • Main Heading of the Second Analysis or Discussion etc..

This section is the most important section of your article. The analysis or results of the research should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.

  • Sub-heading of the discussion
  • Etc…

  

  • CONCLUSION

Conclusion contains a description that should answer the objectives of research. Provide a clear and concise conclusion. Do not repeat the Abstract or simply describe the results of the research. Give a clear explanation regarding the possible application and/or suggestions related to the research findings.

  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (OPTIONAL)

Recognize those who helped in the research, especially funding supporter of your research. Include individuals who have assisted you in your study: Advisors, Financial supporters, or may other supporter i.e. Proof-readers, Typists, and Suppliers who may have given materials.

  • REFERENCES

References in research articles and conceptual ideas contain all the references used in the study. References used in writing are sourced from publications and publications in the last 10 (ten) years. The composition of the reference list / bibliography is highly recommended to maximize the use of primary sources (60%) in the form of national journals, international journals, theses, dissertations, conference proceedings both nationally and internationally. Other sources (40%) can be books or other reference sources. Each article submitted uses a minimum of 16 (sixteen) references by maximizing primary sources, and only references used as citations are written in the reference list, and are written in alphabetical order by the author.

The CENDEKIA: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial & Humaniora uses the Chicago Manual of Style 17th edition (full note) in the References at the end of the manuscript. Cite only items that you have read and written on footnotes. Please use Reference Manager Applications like EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc. Use other published articles in the same journal as models. All publications cited in the text should be included in the References section and arranged alphabetically. For example:

Journal Article:

Footnotes:

1 Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, “A Legal Awareness of Copyright on Regional Song Creators,” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 1 (2021): 49–61, https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15406.

2 La Ode Angga et al., “Effectiveness of Law Number 41 the Year 1999 in the Case of Illegal Logging in Maluku Province,” Cepalo 3, no. 2 (2019): 141–52, https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no2.1848.

References (in alphabetical order):

Angga, La Ode, Barzah Latupono, Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, and Sabri Fataruba. “Effectiveness of Law Number 41 the Year 1999 in the Case of Illegal Logging in Maluku Province.” Cepalo 3, no. 2 (2019): 141–52. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no2.1848.

Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid. “A Legal Awareness of Copyright on Regional Song Creators.” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 1 (2021): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15406.

Book:

Footnotes:

1 Teng Berlianty, Hukum Organisasi Perusahaan (Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara, 2019), p. 1.

2 Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum; Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Arikel. (Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020), p. 164-65.

References (in alphabetical order):

Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum; Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Arikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020.

Berlianty, Teng. Hukum Organisasi Perusahaan. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara, 2019.

  • FIGURES/GRAPHICS

The figures should be clearly readable and at least have a resolution of 300 DPI (Dots Per Inch) for good printing quality.

[1] Our references uses the CHICAGO MANUAL OF STYLE 17th edition (full note). The citation quick guide can be found at: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-1.html Example for Books references: Teng Berlianty, Hukum Organisasi Perusahaan (Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara, 2019), p. 1.

[2] Example for Journal Articles references: Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, “A Legal Awareness of Copyright on Regional Song Creators,” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 1 (2021): 49–61, https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15406

[3] Finnish Administrative Supreme Court 12/2014, “Appeal statistics”, accessed January 13, 2016, http://www.kho.fi/material/attachments/kho/aineistoa/tilastoja/d1DGRBo1H/KHO.fi.pdf.

[4] Vinod Dhall, ed. Competition law today: Concepts, issues, and the law in practice. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 83.

Articles

Section default policy

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.